Invest in Russia — invest in Russian regions!
All analytics

Arctic Sea Ice in CMIP6

Articles
2 July 2020
Льды Арктики в проекте сдвоенной модели взаимного сравнения шестого поколения (CMIP6)
Source
Release date
04/17/2020
Open PDF

This paper by the American Geophysical Union (AGU) forecasts future Arctic sea-ice area and volume evolution. Projections are based on Arctic sea ice simulations generated by the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6). CMIP6 is a global climate multimodel that uses a number of variables such as cumulative anthropogenic CO2 emissions, changes in GMST (global mean surface temperature), etc to capture and forecast changes in Arctic sea-ice coverage.

The Roscongress Foundation presents the salient points of the publication accompanied by fragments of broadcasts of relevant panel discussions from the business programme of international events held by the Roscongress Foundation.

The Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6), the latest generation of global climate models, produces simulations of Arctic sea-ice area and volume evolution.

In recent decades, Arctic sea-ice area has decreased rapidly, and the signal of a forced sea ice retreat has clearly emerged from the background noise of year-to-year variability.

In this publication, the authors extend earlier studies that examined model performance in the third and fifth phases of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP3 and CMIP5) by examining model simulations from the sixth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6), the latest generation of global climate models. For CMIP6, the Sea-Ice Model Intercomparison Project (SIMIP) designed a specific set of diagnostics that allow for detailed analyses of sea ice related processes.

Video: https://roscongress.org/sessions/iaf-2019-arktika-budushchego-ustoychivye-resheniya/search/#00:38:05.312

Internal variability causes a large spread of plausible climate trajectories, which must be kept in mind when interpreting simulations.

Sea-ice parameters such as total sea-ice area and total sea-ice volume are highly variable depending on season, length of observation period, etc.

The authors note that internal variability causes a large spread of plausible climate trajectories in response to a given change in the forcing and must carefully be considered when interpreting a possible mismatch between a simulation and a given observational sea ice record.

For the analysis of the simulated sensitivity of Arctic sea ice to changes in external forcing, the researchers calculate two distinct quantities: first, the change in sea-ice area for a given change in cumulative anthropogenic CO2 emissions over the period 1979–2014 and second, the change in sea-ice area for a given change in GMST (global mean surface temperature) over the period 1979–2014.

Video: https://roscongress.org/sessions/iaf-2019-osvoenie-arktiki-odin-iz-klyuchevykh-prioritetov-nauchno-tekhnologicheskogo-razvitiya-rossii/search/#00:10:01.343

In the vast majority of models, the Arctic Ocean becomes practically sea-ice free by 2050.

In analyzing the future relationship between sea-ice loss and changes in the forcing, the authors find that the simulated correlation between winter Arctic sea-ice area and cumulative CO2 emissions remains high well into the future.

It is important to note that CO2, while being the most important external driver of observed changes in Arctic sea-ice coverage, is not the only cause of observed and future changes. Its dominant role, however, holds well into the future and/or the additional impacts of other anthropogenic forcings, such as methane and aerosols, remain roughly stable over time.

The authors find that in the vast majority of the available CMIP6 simulations, the Arctic Ocean becomes practically sea-ice free in September for the first time before 2050.

Video: https://roscongress.org/sessions/iaf-2019-klyuchevye-aspekty-perspektivnykh-napravleniy-rybnoy-promyshlennosti-v-arktike/search/#01:36:10.496

This paper is part of Geophysical Research Letters. See full version of the journal here.

For more information about rational use of Russia’s natural resources and the development of the Arctic region as a strategic goal for economic and social welfare, please see the Environment, The Arctic, and Basic Research sections of the Roscongress information and analytical system.

Anlytics on the topic

All analytics
Research
31 May 2021
Climate change and corporate value: What companies really think

The research prepared by Eversheds Sutherland and KPMG IMPACT is based on a survey of business leaders on climate change issues and seeks to identify barriers and opportunities for the global corporate response to climate change.


Research
26 May 2022
Russian Chinese Cooperation in the Field of Sustainable Development

Background material for the event «Russian-Chinese Cooperation in the Field of Sustainable Development of the Arctic Region».

Expert opinion
27 April 2020
An opportunity for tourism in the Russian Arctic

Tourism is one of the sectors most heavily affected by COVID-19. Experts believe that the industry will undergo significant restructuring, with travel abroad giving way to domestic tourism, and trips to places where people don’t gather in large numbers becoming more popular. According to Managing Director of the 21st Century Arctic International Union Valery Korovkin, current circumstances offer a chance to develop a new tourist destination. It is an area that has been discussed for a long time, but which little is currently being done to promote. Arctic tourism is a potentially highly profitable business from the perspective of federal and regional budgets, and has long been successfully exploited by other coastal nations.


Research
13 February 2018
Annual Report of the Arctic and Antarctic Expert Advisory Board at the Federation Council (2016)

The Arctic and Antarctic Expert Advisory Board at the Federation Council of the Russian Federation prepares an annual report On the State and Problems of the Legal Framework for the Development Strategy of the Arctic Zone of the Russian Federation and National Security up to 2020. On the State and Problems of the Legal Framework for Russian Scientific Activities in the Antarctic.