Invest in Russia — invest in Russian regions!
All analytics

Russia's Trade and Integration in the Asia-Pacific Region: Results and Prospects

Research
30 September 2019
Торговля и интеграция России в Азиатско-Тихоокеанский регион: результаты и перспективы
Source
,
Release date
09/05/2019
Open PDF
According to the report, in the last twenty years, growth indicators of developing countries exceeded those of developed countries, which led to a considerable shift in the global balance of economic and trade powers, with the share of developing countries in the global economy rising from 36.8% in 1980 to 59.2% now. The developing countries of the Asia-Pacific region have contributed the most to this growth, so APAC has become the world’s most dynamic area in terms of economy, international trade, and integration. Almost 40% of foreign direct investments is now channeled to the APAC countries, sustaining the high growth rates.

Among the most noticeable consequences of the changed balance of power between the developing and the developed countries in the international trade are the crisis of the WTO and the trade war between China and the USA. Given the current trends in international trade, economic conflicts start to influence trade in services, innovation, and digital economy.

For Russia, the outcome of recent processes was that the Asia-Pacific region now appears much more often on Russia’s agenda when setting foreign economy priorities, implementing projects, building bilateral links, and strengthening various formats of multilateral relations. In the context of complicated relationships with the developed countries in recent years, Russia has been systematically increasing the share of the APAC countries in its exports, from 18.5% in 2010 to 29.1% in the first six months of 2019. Russia’s primary foreign trade partners remain unchanged. These are China (15.7% in foreign trade turnover in 2018), the USA (3.6%), Japan (3.1%), India (1.6%), and the Republic of Korea (3.6%). In the foreign trade structure of China, Russia accounts for 2.3%, with 0.7% belonging to the USA, 1.5% to Japan, 1.1% to India and 2.2% to the Republic of Korea.

Besides energy and mineral resources (which account for 64.1% of total exports), the commodity structure of Russia’s exports to APAC is composed of metal products (8.8%); wood, pulp and paper (5.3%); chemical products and natural rubber (5.1%); food products and agricultural raw products (5.0%); machines, equipment, and vehicles (4.2%). As for non-commodity non-energy exports, Russia’s main partners in the APAC region are China (30.1% in 2018), the USA (18.5%), and India (12.7%). The region’s contribution to attracting foreign direct investments to Russia has also increased. While between 2007 and 2015 the annual volume of investments from APAC was USD 0.5-3.2 bn, between 2016 and 2018 Russia attracted USD 23.6 bn in investments from APAC.

The authors of the report point to two main trends that are currently shaping the integration landscape in the APAC region:
  • regional and mega-regional trade agreements which set trade preferences in the region; and
  • rise of protectionism on the part of the USA and its efforts to reinforce bilateral agreements alongside a trade war with China.

When these two trends overlap, overt regionalism practices (such as removal of trade barriers, which leads to an expansion of trade) are replaced by a race for economic interests in the APAC region, with countries that don’t take part in agreements ousted from value-added chains. For Russia, this creates a challenge as far as its plans to expand its non-commodity exports to the APAC region are concerned and means that it will be necessary to step up the actions on its agenda for the development of trade relations with the Asia-Pacific countries.

A promising format of interaction is a practical implementation of the concept of the Greater Eurasian Partnership with an extended number of signatories to agreements with the participation of Russia and the EAEU, both in the sphere of services and investments and in preferential trade in goods. To support the leading role of APAC in Russia’s foreign economy agenda, it is necessary to reinforce the efforts to remove barriers to entering new markets, to carry out mutual investment projects, and to form a common regulatory framework. A delay in implementing the items on this agenda or insufficient determination to do this poses a risk that Russia will be gradually pushed out of value-added and trade chains in the APAC region.

Anlytics on the topic

All analytics
Articles
31 October 2019
Prospects of Development of Trade Relations in the Caspian Region for the Russian Federation

The article discusses key issues related to the development of the Caspian region. The main direction of international cooperation in the development of this territory is the intensification of trading activities, which in turn will allow all countries in the region to increase their economic potential. Already today, the Caspian region attracts the attention of investors and in order to further strengthen trade activities, it is necessary to overcome the obstacles that today have a negative impact on the development of cooperation in the Caspian space. Within the framework of a large Eurasian region, the Caspian basin plays a significant role and, in case of successful development of infrastructure in this region, can bring economic benefits to all participants in trading activities.

Research
17 August 2018
Conditions for exports. A survey of exporters

This report by the Analytical Center for the Government of the Russian Federation is based on a survey of Russian exporting companies and describes the conditions for exports and the existing barriers to exports in Russia.

Analytical digest
6 February 2019
Outcomes of EEF 2018
The slogan for the 4th Eastern Economic Forum in 2018 was ‘The Far East: Expanding the Range of Possibilities’.
Research
12 July 2019
A dead-end war: Why China and the US have resumed trade talks

In this report, the Analytical Credit Rating Agency (ACRA) explains why mutual increase in import tariffs is costly for both China and the US.